PalestineRemembered About Us Oral History العربية
Menu Pictures Zionist FAQs Haavara Maps
PalestineRemembered.com Satellite View Search Donate Contact Us Looting 101 العربية
About Us Zionist FAQs Conflict 101 Pictures Maps Oral History Haavara Facts Not Lies Zionism 101 Zionist Quotes

Haavara Agreement: The Transfer Agreement by Edwin Black

Although this book was written from the Zionists point of view and filled with Zionists Hasbarah ("after the fact explanations" that are not correlated with factual events) to justify being FIRST in normalizing trade and relations with Nazis non-stop for almost 8 years straight (even after Nuremberg Race Laws and Kristallnacht; above all that was nine years ahead of Mufti's collaboration with Hitler late 1941), we highly recommend this book; the research is very good and well foot-noted which enabled us to verify the facts at NY Times wayback server. Although it contains lots of useful data, however, please be alert to Black's Hasbarah (i.e. p. 250, 377, 379-382).

We found this old 1984 review at Foreign Policy by Fritz Stern to be very helpful:

The Transfer Agreement by Edwin Black

Hitler's early anti-Jewish measures provoked worldwide efforts at a boycott of German goods, a measure that would have injured a still precarious economy. Jews orchestrated these efforts at a boycott, but hesitated over whether it would inflame or moderate German anti-Semitism. Meanwhile Zionist leadership and the Third Reich agreed on arrangements whereby German Jews could emigrate to Palestine under somewhat more favorable financial conditions and whereby German trade with Palestinian Jewry would increase. In turn, majority Zionists (as against the Revisionists) backed away from the boycott. The author documents the divisions within Jewry, insisting that the Zionists put their cause-German emigration to Palestine-ahead of the possible protection of Jews via more militant economic measures. Although shockingly deficient in his grasp of German developments, Black explicates the several Jewish positions, and seems to argue both that an early boycott might have succeeded and that "the Zionists were the coldest realists-perhaps the only realists-of the period."

 

Here is another relevant review by Avraham Baraki, pay attention to the notes section

We found the 25th anniversary version hosted at archive.org, and we tought you may find it useful.

 

Post Your Comment

I'm half way through this book and previously read his other book, "Internal Combustion," and he's a very good researcher. He makes a compelling case that for Zionists the top priority is restoring Israel, not the best interests of Jews.

Both the Nazis and Zionists robbed the Jews, and it's almost guaranteed that this agreement did far more to enable Germany to rearm and turn on the Jews than to save Jews. In other words, the Holocaust almost certainly could have been prevented! Furthermore, this agreement also enabled the oppression of Palestinians, who were not responsible for the Holocaust.

As I said, Black is a very good researcher, but I can't understand how he remained a supporter of Israel after doing this research, even though his parents and other relative were victims of the Nazis. He shows many Jews were victims of both the Nazis and the Zionists, and so are Palestinians.
 
Fake Valor: Why Did Zionist Jews Hoist Nazis Flag on Their Ships in the 1930s?

What is new?