
For the average Palestinian, asking this question implies that the Palestinian people should pay the price for the collaboration of a few individuals with the Nazis! Yes, you read that correctly. Once the Italian and Nazi records were examined, only a few Palestinians with the Nazis and Italian armies. Therefore, by any ethical standard, it is unjust and unfair to condemn a whole nation and its future generations for the actions of a few. Not only did Palestinians and many Arabs cease resisting the British colonization of their countries, but they also supported the Allies with men and logistical support. Most importantly, Arabs, in general, did not heed Mufti's calls for Jihad against the Allies, which he declared in April 1941 (read it yourself from big Zionist Benny Morris in the Righteous Victims, p. 165).
God forbid, if Palestinians are held responsible for the decisions of a few, what does that say about the majority of European nations who openly sided with the Nazis! As it will be proven shortly from Israeli and Zionist sources, Zionists and their supporters in the civilized and democratic West have been using Mufti as their favorite deflection tool to mask and hide their fascist past since the 1940s. Once the facts are exposed (mostly sourced from Israeli and Zionist sources), your understanding of WWII's events will be upended; stay tuned.

Since the Palestinian people were promised complete independence after the war with strict limitations on Jewish immigration to Palestine, based on the 1939 White Paper, Palestinians had the incentive to help the Allies win the war (we shall prove soon that the yishuv did the exact opposite). It should be noted that A) several Palestinian brigades were enlisted into the British Army, B) Palestinian resistance to the brutal British occupation almost entirely ceased during and after WWII (see Arab Revolt of 1936), and C) many of those Arabs (from North Africa, Palestine, and Jordan) who enlisted saw action during WWII, not like Zionists' Jewish Brigades who saw little action five weeks before the war ended!

Yes, we do recognize that 35,000 to 45,000 of the yishuv enlisted in the British army and 32 brave parachutist were dropped behind enemy lines. On the other hand, what is the point of citing such statistics when we know that leaders purposely avoided the meat grinders in North Africa, Italy, and France? Ironically, when Zionists records were examined, we found that so-called yishuv were enlisted in the British army to gain military training and to be prepared to fight the real enemy (those "evil" Arabs) just a few years later (see The Seventh Million by Tom Segev, p. 83-84 & 113). Think about it for a minute: why fight the Nazis, who could bleed your blood and treasure, when the brave Gentiles were doing a good job? To the yishuv's credit, at least they took nice selfies at the front: cheers guys, see me while I bomb the Nazis!
It should be emphasized again that when Palestinians CEASED resisting the British occupation during WWII, two of Israel's future PMs (Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir) were busy bombing the Allies' war efforts. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, Zionists' fake valor continued when they knew well that the Nazis were gassing their families in Poland! Allow these facts to sink in for a minute, then ask yourself: i) How Zionist actions and policies in the 1930s and 40s didn't help the Nazis? ii) How Palestinian actions during WWII didn't help the Allies defeat the Nazis? iii) Why does Yad Vashem still celebrate Zionists' fake valor while it denigrated Arab and Muslim contributions in defeating the Nazis?

Shamelessly, many so-called Jewish "historians and editors" have been portraying yishuv's fake valor (especially during WWII) as if it was an insurgency by the "indigenous people" who were seeking independence from the oppression of European colonizers! Such a Hasbarah term, insurgency, would've been way more appropriate if the so-called "insurgency" was against the Nazis who were committing the genocide, instead of terrorizing those who were actively fighting the genociders? Ladies and gentlemen, this is propaganda on steroids!

In general, the Palestinian people are proud of the fact that they were among the few who did not collaborate openly with the Nazis. On the other hand, the peoples and governments of France, Italy, Japan, Romania, Japan, Croatia, Finland, Latvia, Hungary, Ukraine, Austria, Bulgaria, Sweden, Austria, ... etc. all openly collaborated with the Nazis. Tragically, many of these people and governments happily handed out their Jewish citizens to the Gestapo. Therefore, it's unfair, if not outright criminal, to exploit Hajj Amin's conduct to eternally condemn the Palestinian people as Nazis or antisemites, while ignoring the choices made by most European nations and governments.
At least the Palestinian people did not harbor nor cover up for Nazi war criminals as the US has done for decades (if you have the time, please watch Judgment at Nuremberg or the truth about Operation Paperclip). If you think Western liberal democracies fought Nazis because they were remotely anti-fascists (as often they are portrayed in the Western media), think twice! If you have 40 minutes to spare, we urge you to hear Rachel Maddow talking about the America First Committee and Christian Front during WWII, then you will recognize how and why fascism is on the rise in the "liberal West"! In the power centers, Nazis and fascists were always dormant behind the curtains!

It is worth pointing out that when Palestine was forced to receive persecuted European Jewish citizens beyond its limits, the United States denied entry visas to wealthy German Jews in August 1938 and forced them to return to Europe! Let us not judge the Americans harshly; the Jewish Agency (the governing body of the Zionist movement during the pre-Nakba period) refused to grant those German Jews any immigration certificates as well! Ironically, it was David Ben-Gurion (the head of the Jewish Agency at the time) who wished death to the ten thousand German Jewish kids who were saved by the British (see Kindertransport for details) a month after the Kristallnacht pogrom because they went to England rather than Palestine (Ben-Gurion described such a thing as "Witch Doctor's Medicine"). Much to our surprise, Ben-Gurion's statement was never retracted (which he repeated since December 1938). On top of that, Ben-Gurion and the Jewish Agency NEVER thanked the British people for welcoming the Jewish kids in a hurry! Oddly, to this date, Jews NEVER condemned his blatant antisemitism, which was translated into a policy during WWII and after the war ended in the DP camps!

Let's assume for a minute; God forbid of course; that it was Zionist leaders who did collaborate with fascists (i.e., Mussolini) & Nazis in Germany; would you (speaking to Zionists and Jews) condemn Jews for the decisions of such leaders? Would you hesitate in weaponizing Never Again, antisemitism, and the Holocaust (the same way they are often used against Palestinians), but now against Jews? Be careful of what you wish for; continue reading the next few paragraphs!
IRONICALLY, the shocking truth is that it has been proven that the Stern gang (a.k.a. Lehi) and Jobotinskey's Betar received funding and arms from Italian Fascists to terrorize British forces in Palestine. Actually, Lehi reached out for an alliance with the Nazis in early and late 1941, and it was Hitler who rebuffed them. It is worth emphasizing again that when the Americans, British, and their Arab allies were busy blocking the Desert Fox's (Erwin Rommel) advances in North Africa, two of Israel's future PM's (Yitzhak Shamir and Irgun's leader, Menachem Begin) were busy sabotaging allies' war efforts during WWII, ambushing British soldiers, blowing up the vital Haifa-Cairo railroad supply line, and terrorizing British and Palestinian civilians (Righteous Victims by Benny Morris, p. 174). To add salt into the wound, when Yitzhak Shamir, Israel's future Prime Minister in the 1980s, was asked to explain his group's fake valor, he replied:
Fake Valor: Jewish-Brigade, Italy April - 1945: The Impostering Hero, see me while I bomb Nazis. We wonder: Were any similar selfies taken at the al-Alamein meat grinder?
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend." (One Palestine Complete , p. 464).
This paragraph alone should make it clear what was front and center on Zionist Jews' mindset, and defeating Nazism or saving Europe's Jews were the last thing on their minds. Again, when Shamir did this, his family was being gassed in Poland! Stay tuned, more on Zionists' fake valor and treason will be exposed shortly.
Since these findings have only JUST started to surface lately (and are kept smothered in many Jewish communities), we feel it's necessary to cite one of the MOST pro-Israel historians directly, Martin Gilbert, who wrote:
"Avraham Stern, who had formed a breakaway 'Irgun in Israel' movement (also known as the Stern Gang), tried to make contact with Fascist Italy in the hope that, if Mussolini were to conquer the Middle East, he would allow a Jewish State to be set up in Palestine. When Mussolini's troops were defeated in North Africa, Stern tried to make contact with Nazi Germany, hoping to sign a pact with Hitler that would lead to a Jewish State once Hitler had defeated Britain. After two members of Stern's Gang had killed the Tel Aviv [British] police chief and two of his officers, Stern himself was caught and killed. His followers [chief among them Yitzhak Shamir, who led the Stern Gang after Stern's death] continued on their path of terror." (Israel: A History, p. 111-112)
When Jews are confronted with this unpleasant fact (that one of their groups, Lehi, offered its KAPO service to Hitler in early and late 1941) they deflect by saying that was a fringe group. Yes, that was true, but what kind of a "nation or a people" that honors traitors by naming several streets after Lehi's leader, placing the portrait of Avraham Stern on a stamp, and even named a Kibbutz after him? That speaks volumes; welcome to the Land of Kapos, where traitors got a free pass but those who exposed them were prosecuted and boycotted by the state!

Here is the unvarnished truth: there is no justification for Mufti’s shameful collaboration with Nazis during WWII. That said, we should put this into a larger context where the majority of European and Zionist leaders either did similar things or sought an alliance with Nazis as late as 1941. A few things to add in the case of Mufti: A) The British and Zionist forces hunted down Mufti, and only as a last resort did Mufti go to Germany looking for aid after being chased out of Iraq (in late May 1941). B) Mufti didn't formulate Nazi policies as Bibi Netanyahu shamelessly implied in 2015; Mufti's work concentrated on spreading Nazi propaganda in the Middle East and North Africa (see the Washington Post Oct. 22, 2015 for more details). C) Most importantly, Mufti never objected to saving Europe's Jews by sending them anywhere except for Palestine. Michael A. Sells examined the Zionist and German archives looking for the evidence against Mufti concerning this point, and he found nothing (read his paper, Holocaust Abuse, p. 730). Thus, Mufti's main goal was to avoid a Nakba as much as possible. On the other hand, Zionist leaders did peruse the exact opposite policies by focusing ONLY Palestine as a haven for Europe's Jews. Therefore, YES, Mufti was antisemitic, but that doesn't mean he was genocidal. On the other hand, what Zionists did was way more antisemitic and genocidal. By focusing on Palestine, as the ONLY destination for Europe's Jews at the height of the calamity, was the ultimate betrayal.
Thus, in practice, Zionist leaders made sure that Europe's Jews were left with two options: either they make Aliyah to Palestine to join the yishuv, or go to Auschwitz; and lobbied feverishly like hell against any viable thirds alternative. This evil policy persisted even after WWII ended in the displaced persons (D.P.) camps, please read it from the NY Times' editor two years before Nakba in October 1946. In light of these facts, Palestinians have every right to ask:
- Why do Zionist Jews deflect away from European crimes and direct their hate toward Palestinians? Palestinians only resist those who replaced them.
- Why are they making Palestinians liable for Mufit’s acts but giving a free pass to Europeans who murdered them in the millions?
-
Is it possible that the Haavara Agreement (between Ben-Gurion & Hitler 1933-1940) enabled the devil once Zionists helped break up an anti-Nazi worldwide boycott? Keep in mind that Hitler kept Europe's doors wide open for Jews to leave as late as October 1941 and offered to ship Jews anywhere, at Germany's expense, on luxury liners!
Which hate speech was worse: Hitler's hate speech at the Reichstag on Jan 30th, 1939, or Ben-Gurion's speech (just two months before Hitler's speech) when he incited the murder of German Jews a month after the Kristallnacht pogrom?
- Does that explain why investigating Zionists' policies and actions during this period was nixed? Here it is from the NY Times. Palestinians wonder, were American Jews afraid of opening Pandora's Box that could implode their community?
- When the Gentiles saw how Jewish nationalists (a.k.a. Zionist Jews) were FIRST to break the anti-Nazi boycott, ban the anti-Nazi protest, praise Nuremberg Race Laws, normalize trade & relations with Hitler for 7 to 8 years with no interruption, who can blame them (referring to the Gentiles) for normalizing trade with the Nazis? Think about it: by enabling the devil at his weakest point in early 1933, how Haavara didn’t end up killing Jews instead of saving them?
- Is it possible Zionists have given European antisemites a free pass in return for political and economic alliance three years after the Shoah ended? Note that this alliance was once predicted by Theodor Herzl since the end of the 19th century.
- Does that explain why European nations eagerly voted for partitioning Palestine on November 29th, 1947?
-
Contrary to what we've pointed out earlier, let's assume that Palestinians did heed Mufti's call for Jihad against the Allies during Erwin Rommel's offensive in Egypt. Then, it would have been plausible that Palestine could've become Nazi-occupied. In that counterfactual world, Nakba wouldn't have happened. Despite that, the vast majority of Jews still refuse to recognize Palestinians' service to the Allies' war efforts. On the contrary, Palestinians are being blamed for the Holocaust!
Yad Vashem Honors Fake Valor: The Impostering Heroes are being recognized but the Palestinians (who actually saw action fighting the Nazis at the meat grinder in North Africa) have been denigrated!
- Is it possible that Zionist Jews are using Mufti Haj Amin as their patsy to deflect away from their deeds during the 1930s & 40s?
-
When David Ben-Gurion fomented antisemitism against Germany's Jews four years ahead of Mufti and Hitler (a month after the Kristallnacht pogrom),
Look who is copying from Joseph Goebbels' propaganda playbook. Birds of a feather always flock together
Did Ben-Gurion make this antisemitic statement because he wanted to "save" or endanger Jews?
Did Zionist Jews ever condemn Ben-Gurion's antisemitism?
Did David's policy become Zionists' policy, which PERSISTED during WWII and at the height of the calamity?
How did endangering Europe's Jews benefit the Zionist movement?
Did Zionist leaders turn Jews' plight into the LEVER (hoping it would cause a Jewish refugee crisis) that build their "Jewish state"?
Is it possible that Zionist leaders executed a similar policy to induce another refugee crisis but for the Arab Jews?
We've concluded that Zionism cannot be understood unless the Haavara Agreement is studied carefully, and then you shall discover how fomenting antisemitism has always been good for Zionism. Therefore, why should Zionists stop what has been working for them from inception?
Does this explain why investigating Zionists' policies and actions was NIXED in early 1983? Hush-hush. If you bring it up, you are the "antisemite" and the "hater."
What makes many Palestinians and Arabs FUME WITH ANGER is that the memories of the Holocaust are being weaponized to paint Palestinians as Nazis & antisemitic, as if Zionist Jews expect Palestinians to love (rather than hate) those who replaced them! Palestinians have legitimate political grievances: they were dispossessed and ethnically cleansed out of their homes, farms & businesses. Such dangerous propaganda tactics have continuously been fed to many Israeli school children from its inception, especially upon visiting the Holocaust museum at Yad Vashem. It should be emphasized that many life-size pictures of al-Hajj Amin standing alongside Hitler were on display at Yad Vashem, just West of Jerusalem, not far from DEIR YASSIN. Ironically, after seven decades of abusing the Holocaust, Dani Dayan (the head of Yad Vashem) just had enough of this Hasbarah on steroids and removed Mufti's picture recently. Is not it hypocritical when many Zionist Jews hold Palestinians collectively responsible for the "ill-fated" choice of al-Hajj Amin, while Israelis and Jews still blind themselves to the choices some of their leaders made during WWII? Sadly, when the Holocaust and antisemitism are weaponized willy-nilly to paint Palestinians as Nazis, how such acts didn't already debase Shoah and dishonors its victims? Ironically, Jews in mass behave as if they don't care, mazeltov!
Related Links
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs: Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Nazis and the Holocaust: The Origins, Nature and Aftereffects of Collaboration by Jeffery Herf
- Washington Post: The real reason a Palestinian mufti allied with Hitler? It’s not so shocking, by Ishaan Tharoor
- Video: Weaponized Anti-Semitism Allegations: How Israel Plays the Victim, Inverts Reality & Stifles Dissent (68 minutes)
- Zionist Quotes: Bible & Holocaust Weaponization
- HOLOCAUST ABUSE The Case of Hajj Muhammad Amin al-Husayni by Michael A. Sells
- Ze'ev Jabotinsky being PROUD of his fascist uniform
- Wikipedia: Lehi's attempted alliance with Nazis against Great Britain in early & late 1941
- A scanned copy of the document sent by the Stern Gang asking Nazi Germany for an alliance
-
Must Watch: Prof. Norman Finkelstein on Holocaust weaponization at the University of Waterloo
NYTimes, Aug 25th, 1933: Zionists Rejected Boycott of Reich
- And What Did You Do In The War, Grandpa?
- Facts about the Haavara Agreement between David Ben-Gurion & Hitler?
- Zionism, anti-Semitism and colonialism Joseph Massad
- Los Angeles Times: Paper Breaks Taboo on Shamir, Nazi Link: Jerusalem Post Cites Stern Gang Past, Hits Stance on Peace Now
- Middle East Eye: Netanyahu, Hitler, al-Mufti Al-Hussaini and the Holocaust by Basheer Nafi
- Mondoweiss: The ‘Zionist Betrayal of Jews’ from Herzl to Netanyahu, by Stanley Heller
- Modoweiss: Britain says releasing a 1941 document about Palestine might "undermine security"
- BBC: Aftermath of the Zionists' Terror Attack on the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, Palestine | July 1946
- Wikipedia: Evian Conference
- Video: Lenni Brenner on the rise of Zionist Fascism (6 minutes)
- London Review of Books: Memory Failure Pankaj Mishra. Excellent short read on a TABOO subject: How Germany has been using Israel to "cleanse" its fascist past and present.
- The Irgun Zvai Leumi: From Terrorists to Politicians By Brandon Sellers
- Dershowitz: Nazis OK; too bad the Mufti corrupted themBy The Hasbara Buster
- Ha'aretz: When Jews Praised Mussolini and Supported Nazis: Meet Israel's first fascists by Dan Tamir
- Meet Cheif Pogromist: Symon Petliura, Jabotinsky's 1st antisemitic ally
- Zionist FAQ: The Hebron Massacre of 1929, "clearly proves" that Palestinians are antisemitic, how could you deny it?
- Foreign Policy: How Zionist Extremism Became British Spies’ Biggest Enemy
- Haaretz: Jabotinsky's embarrassing offer
- NY Times: Nazis Were Given 'Safe Haven' in U.S., Report Says
- Pres. George Bush: The US should have acted on Auschwitz
- Merkel: Germans ashamed of the Holocaust
- The Untermensch Syndrome: Israel's Moral Decay
- Hitler & Zionists and the transfer agreement
- FDR, Gruber and me: Zionists stymie WWII rescue plan
- NY Times: Nazis Were Given 'Safe Haven' in U.S., Report Says
- The Transfer Agreement Between the Nazis and the Zionists in 1933
- The Zionist-Nazi Collaboration by William James Martin
- NY Times: Book Tries for Balanced View on Roosevelt and Jews
Post Your Comment
*It should be NOTED that your email address won't be shared, and all communications between members will be routed via the website's mail server.
They don't, I'n fact the Holocaust card is used to replace the Germans in their own homeland.
" Did Zionist Jews ever condemn Ben-Gurion's antisemitism"
No He was a Bolshevik from the USSR meaning he was a Zionist himself